Home | Cloud | Cloud Computing: Trawling the Toxic Wastedump

Cloud Computing: Trawling the Toxic Wastedump

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 StumbleUpon 0 Buffer 0 LinkedIn 0 Filament.io 0 Flares ×

recycleA quick Tweet with Chris Mellor just reminded me of something I touched on a few months ago but always meant to write about in more detail.  It’s a semi-serious analogy (it is Friday after all) but there’s a hint of the possible about it, so here goes.

We’re all creating too much content.  Whether that’s at home or at work, there’s just too much stuff about.  It’s duplicated files, downloads of software, documents we created and never looked at, pictures (some useful, some we’ll never print but just retain regardless).  What we need is a waste dump for all of this infrequently referenced content.

So, the cloud storage offerings become an extension of your desktop.  A background task farms through your files, looking for stuff you’ve not referenced for a while, pushing it off to a cloud storage vendor and leaving a stub or link to the file in case you need it.  They analyse the file, determine whether the content is useful and push it back to you if it is, delete it if not (alternatively you get a report indicating whether your data is any use – you choose to delete or retain at low cost in the cloud).  All of the functionality is policy-based, set by the customer.

What’s in it for you?  As a home user, you get your pictures, word documents, video, MP3s all nicely indexed and managed.  You don’t have to think about the process of keeping stuff organised, just throw it at your virtual recycling centre.  If you’re a business, your files gets scanned for illegal or copyright content; it gets checked for files which meet certain policies on business-related content – it could even be farmed for the content, depending on what the files are.  As a business, you keep your onsite storage costs down, you get offsite backup & location independence and the ability to certify to the authorities that you pro-actively seek out and remove content which may result in litigation from copyright owners.

What does the vendor get?  Well, customers may choose to backup and/or archive their files – for a fee.  We’re all inherently lazy and if someone else confirms that you’re only backing up what’s necessary then you’ll be attracted to the service.  Businesses can be charged for processing content and the cost made more attractive than simply keeping more data on bigger and bigger filers.  Bear in mind that cloud vendors are going to have to differentiate themselves somehow.

About Chris M Evans

Chris M Evans has worked in the technology industry since 1987, starting as a systems programmer on the IBM mainframe platform, while retaining an interest in storage. After working abroad, he co-founded an Internet-based music distribution company during the .com era, returning to consultancy in the new millennium. In 2009 Chris co-founded Langton Blue Ltd (www.langtonblue.com), a boutique consultancy firm focused on delivering business benefit through efficient technology deployments. Chris writes a popular blog at http://blog.architecting.it, attends many conferences and invitation-only events and can be found providing regular industry contributions through Twitter (@chrismevans) and other social media outlets.
  • http://seanclark.us Sean Clark

    Sounds like ILM as a service combined with archiving as a service. My wife and I want to send out shoe boxes of pictures to someone to scan into cloud for us. We are also reaching point where our digital photo storage is becoming unmanageable. There is huge opportunity in this space for home users as well as business users like you said above.

    ILM is hard to get right and expensive to deploy and manage. Sounds like it passes the litmus test to fill in the blank. _______-as a service.

    Good thoughts!

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 StumbleUpon 0 Buffer 0 LinkedIn 0 Filament.io 0 Flares ×